Abstract

We have created an unsustainable development even though the fathers of science have properly legislated the single principles of physical, chemical, mechanical, thermodynamic energy, preparing the work for industrial inventions that began with the discovery of steam and electrical energy. We owe little to the inventors who chose the production of electricity from the worst sources, neglecting the side effects, which led to global warming. We owe less to public science and to world legislators, who should have watched and corrected these choices to ensure sustainable development for future generations. We owe little to the politicians and the world economists, who give the assumption of the current model of development. Instead it is all to be redone, starting from the principles of the fathers of science that are not used individually, but synergistically, after the inventions of electric motors and current generators, which coupled, respectively, to modified pumps and turbines, in modified hydraulic systems, make all the other world energies totally useless and counterproductive. But, from the world summits of the last decades and the current ones, it does not seem that on the planet Earth there are statesmen able to take the responsibility of telling the truth. I could have provided the evidence alone, if I had not spent my savings unnecessarily to pay for deposits of international patents, which should not be paid on those of public utility, if the world legislators worked for the common good. Obviously, public utility patents should be accessible to all, recognizing the copyrights to the inventors. We are a zero year of sustainable development, because public science and legislators have prevented the creation of interactive solutions between water and air, which are simultaneously energetic and purifying, with very high yields. With the interactive systems it is possible to compare the energy, environmental and economic aspects of a single plant with the current systems that perform the same functions, but separately, with greater costs and greater dimensions. What works today in partial applications with low yields, will also work in interactive applications, with high yields, because interactivity is not contrary to what was said by Newton, Torricelli, Pascal, Henry, Maxwell, Herz, Ferraris, Tesla. Someone should explain it to the world economic development ministries and patent offices.